King's Camo Mountain Shadow camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

King's Camo

Mountain Shadow
This pattern stands out most for darker than most patterns, low tonal separation; concentrated, with stronger directional imbalance; and brown / Black, high saturation, strongly warm.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, low tonal separation
Very low overall brightness and very high dark-area share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Spatial Distribution

Concentrated, with stronger directional imbalance
Very low information balance and high left right compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Color Character

Brown / Black, high saturation, strongly warm
High saturation compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: black
Warm 99.3%
Cool 0.7%
Neutral 4.7%
Light & Dark
Dark 62.8%
Mid 35.6%
Light 1.6%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 26.1%
Mid 28.2%
Large 45.7%
Dominant scale: macro

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Black, high saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Black. Its average color saturation is high compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern carries stronger color intensity than most reference patterns.

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, low tonal separation

62.8% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal groups are less distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads dark at a glance.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is low, average detected edge strength is low, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to transition more gently than in many reference patterns.

Texture Character

Smooth, evenly distributed texture

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is low, and texture uniformity is high compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture activity is distributed more consistently across the pattern.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is low, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is concentrated into fewer effective regions than in many reference patterns.

Pattern Scale

Large-scale dominant

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as macro. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is low, and large-scale energy is high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Large visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.

Spatial Distribution

Concentrated, with stronger directional imbalance

Spatial information balance is very low, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are high, high, and typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Visual activity is more concentrated overall and is also arranged less symmetrically across one or more directions.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with darker or more shadowed overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation. Its lower tonal separation should fit flatter, more blended backgrounds. Its large-scale structure favors backgrounds containing broader visual masses and structural features. Its smoother, more uniform texture aligns with backgrounds whose surface detail remains relatively consistent.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to very bright or pale backgrounds, strongly broken or high-contrast backgrounds, and backgrounds dominated only by tiny repetitive detail.

Breakup Character

The pattern contains relatively few detected edges. Visual activity is distributed less evenly across the pattern.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Most Similar Patterns

These are the closest measured matches based on Pattern DNA color, tone, texture, shape, scale and layout.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.