Against Late Fall Hardwoods, Blindtech Invisible II scores 38/100 (), while New Break-Up scores 47/100 ().
Based on color alignment, breakup scale, and texture density, the AI sees an approximate 9-point lean toward New Break-Up in this particular environment.
Alaska Blindtech Invisible II and Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up are both mixed-scale patterns, so they behave similarly from a scale point of view. Both patterns balances micro and macro elements, keeping them fairly steady across different shot distances. Density differs slightly: Alaska Blindtech Invisible II packs in heavier texture, while Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up stays fairly balanced in texture, changing how much the natural background shows through.
Alaska Blindtech Invisible II vs Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up
Alaska Blindtech Invisible II and Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up have been analyzed using our CamoMatrix AI engine, which measures scale, density, and edge behavior directly from the flat pattern artwork. Both land in the mixed-scale category, meaning they balance fine texture with larger breakup blocks instead of living at one extreme. Alaska Blindtech Invisible II packs in heavier texture, while Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up stays fairly balanced in texture. Hunters who prefer more background showing may favor the more open one; dense patterns can help disrupt shape in chaotic vegetation. Edge style diverges: Alaska Blindtech Invisible II mixes both hard and soft edges, while Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up leans into smoother, blended transitions. Softer edges often melt better into natural backgrounds, while harder edges can create stronger breakup in certain lighting. Alaska Blindtech Invisible II's scale index trends a touch higher, making its breakup blocks slightly larger than those in Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up. Alaska Blindtech Invisible II runs a little denser on our readings, while Nomad Outdoor New Break-Up leaves slightly more background showing through — which some hunters prefer in simpler, more open environments. As always, these results come from flat pattern imagery. Real-world performance depends heavily on terrain, season, and how the garments fit and move.
This is a pattern-only comparison from flat artwork. Terrain, season, and real backgrounds will still push one or the other ahead in specific setups.
Learn how the CamoMatrix AI evaluates camouflage patterns
Defines the dominant size of shapes in the pattern.
Indicates which scale range the pattern leans toward overall.
How busy the pattern is with shapes and noise.
How hard or soft shape boundaries are.